Accuracy and clinical performance of conventional versus digital impressions for maxillary complete dentures: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Accuracy and clinical performance of conventional versus digital impressions for maxillary complete dentures: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Download PDF Abstract This study aimed to compare the three-dimensional trueness of digital impressions with conventional impressions for maxillary complete dentures and to evaluate the clinical performance of denture bases fabricated from each technique. Twenty completely edentulous participants received both conventional impressions and digital impressions using an intraoral scanner in a randomized crossover design.

Conventional impressions were digitized and used as reference models. Trueness was assessed by root mean square (RMS) deviations for the entire surface and predefined anatomical regions. Denture bases were fabricated using stereolithographic 3D printing.

Retention, stability, and support were clinically evaluated by blinded examiners. Statistical analyses included parametric and nonparametric tests (α = 0.05) with effect size estimation. Mean RMS deviation for the entire digital impression was 234.63 ± 43.87 μm and was significantly below the 300-µm reference threshold (Cohen’s d = − 1.49, representing the standardized difference from this threshold).

Medical Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with qualified healthcare professionals for medical decisions and treatment options.