OpenAI has asked a federal judge to dismiss Apple’s lawsuit accusing the AI company of stealing trade secrets, calling the allegations “meritless. Bloomberg reports that the filing defends Chief Hardware Officer Tang Yew Tan, who spent 24 years at Apple as VP of product design for iPhone and Apple Watch before leaving to
io merged with OpenAI in July 2025.
OpenAI said Tan followed normal industry recruiting practices when interviewing Apple staff. OpenAI also defended senior systems engineer Chang Liu, one of two former Apple employees named in the suit.
The ongoing Apple-OpenAI lawsuit of alleged trade secrets theft continues, with OpenAI today filing a motion to have the case dismissed by a federal judge. OpenAI said Apple’s complaint was “filed without adequate investigation” and framed “ordinary conduct” out of context. Meanwhile, Apple is currently pressing for a preliminary injunction, which will be heard in court on October 1. The larger case could take years to resolve.
OpenAI has asked a federal judge to toss out Apple's landmark lawsuit accusing the ChatGPT maker of stealing trade secrets, describing the allegations as "meritless." In a motion filed yesterday to dismiss the complaint, OpenAI says that Apple is mischaracterizing both the actions of the AI startup's employees as theft, and "generic" product development information […].
Taken together, the reporting frames a wider question about evidence, product design, and how readers should judge claims before treating a headline as a medical conclusion.
Figures cited in the reporting include 24 years.
" Lawyers for OpenAI said Apple's suit twists the actions of its employees. " In a motion filed yesterday to dismiss the complaint, OpenAI says that Apple is mischaracterizing both the actions of the AI startup's employees as theft, and "generic" product development information […]
What to watch:
- peer review, replication, or clinical follow-up evidence
Information compiled from MacRumors, 9to5Mac, The Verge.
Medical Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with qualified healthcare professionals for medical decisions and treatment options.
Why This Matters
What changed: The ongoing Apple-OpenAI lawsuit of alleged trade secrets theft continues, with OpenAI today filing a motion to have the case dismissed by a federal judge. The development is getting attention — at least 3 independent outlets have covered it. For ai new readers, readers should watch what changes in real products, real tools, and real daily use.
Chucky’s Analysis
The most concrete part of this story is that OpenAI said Apple’s complaint was “filed without adequate investigation” and framed “ordinary conduct” out of context.
With 3 outlets carrying the story, the core facts are likelier to hold, but details still vary between accounts — which is why the differences matter as much as the headline.
The open question for ai news readers is how the story develops in independent, verifiable follow-ups.
The signal to watch is official confirmation and technical details.
Key Takeaways
- What we know: Meanwhile, Apple is currently pressing for a preliminary injunction, which will be heard in court on October 1.
- What it means for you: readers should watch what changes in real products, real tools, and real daily use.
- What to watch next: official confirmation and technical details.
Sources
This article was compiled from the following independent reporting:
Links direct readers to the original coverage so claims can be checked directly.
Conclusion
In short: openAI has asked a federal judge to toss out Apple's landmark lawsuit accusing the ChatGPT maker of stealing trade secrets, describing the allegations as "meritless. Watch for official confirmation and technical details before drawing conclusions about real-world impact.
Related Reading
More coverage from ChuckysCarnage on this topic:
Keep Exploring
Browse more stories on the site:
About the Author
ChuckysCarnage is an independent technology news site covering gadgets, software, science, and space. Every article is written from the day’s independent reporting, checked against the linked original sources, and reviewed for accuracy before it goes live. Corrections are handled through the Contact page and the Editorial Policy.
ChuckysCarnage 